Climate Change
Basic Approach
Since the adoption of the Paris Agreement, efforts toward carbon neutrality have been recognized as a common global challenge, and this movement is now accelerating even further.
Zeon Group considers addressing climate change an important social challenge and aims to realize carbon neutrality. While climate change has a significant impact on the business environment, we recognize it not only as a risk but also as a chance to create new business opportunities.
Based on this approach, we support the TCFD recommendations, disclose information in accordance with the TCFD framework, and promote climate change initiatives integrated with our management strategy.
In addition, at each of our domestic and overseas sites, we support laws, regulations, and policies concerning climate change and the reduction of energy consumption, and respond to them appropriately. In Japan, this includes the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures and the Act on the Rational Use of Energy.
Carbon Neutrality Master Plan
In our Medium-Term Business Plan: STAGE30, we have set “Promote a transformation of monozukuri to realize carbon neutrality and a circular economy.” Regarding the reduction of greenhouse gas (CO2) emissions (Scope 1 + 2), we aim for a 42% reduction across the entire Group by FY2030 compared to FY2020, and this target has been certified by the Science Based Targets (SBT) initiative.

Disclosure Based on TCFD Recommendations
Governance
Board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities
The Board of Directors receives regular reports from management on material sustainability issues, including climate-related risks and opportunities, and oversees our response policies as well as the progress and effectiveness of related initiatives. At Zeon Corporation, important sustainability-related matters, including the status of climate change initiatives, are deliberated and decided by the Sustainability Committee and the Management Committee, and are then reported to the Board twice a year as part of our sustainability reporting. The Board provides comments and advice on these reports, which we reflect in our various initiatives, including our response to TCFD. Through this process, the Board continuously monitors our responses to climate-related risks and opportunities.
Management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities
Management positions responses to climate-related risks and opportunities as one of its material sustainability issues. Response policies and key initiatives are deliberated and decided at the Management Committee chaired by the Representative Director. The Sustainability Committee identifies and assesses climate-related risks and opportunities and examines and promotes response measures based on frameworks such as the TCFD. Based on these deliberations, the Management Committee makes decisions on the Company's responses. Through this governance structure, management is involved throughout the entire process of assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities.
Strategy
Climate-related risks and opportunities the organization has identified over the short, medium, and long term
The Sustainability Committee and its subordinate TCFD Subcommittee play a central role in identifying and assessing climate-related risks and opportunities from short-, medium-, and long-term perspectives, taking into account the impacts of climate change on our business. As part of this process, during FY2020, our Rubber Business Division conducted a 2°C/4°C scenario analysis (RCP2.6/RCP8.5) and identified climate-related risks and opportunities. In FY2021, we expanded these efforts company-wide and analyzed the impacts across all of our businesses through the same scenario analysis. In FY2023, we conducted a 1.5°C scenario analysis to examine medium- to long-term transition risks and opportunities. In addition, in FY2024, we expanded the scope of the 4°C scenario (RCP8.5) analysis, which had previously covered the Takaoka Plant, Kawasaki Plant, Tokuyama Plant, and Mizushima Plant, to include the Himi Futagami Plant and Tsuruga Plant, for a total of six plants. Based on this scenario, we identified and assessed risks with a primary focus on long-term physical risks. Based on the results of these analyses, we organize climate-related risks and opportunities from the perspectives of their short-term impacts on business activities, medium-term impacts on business structure and investment decisions, and long-term impacts on business continuity and changes in the competitive environment, and utilize these findings in formulating our business strategy.
- *RCP refers to the climate change projection scenarios presented by the IPCC based on greenhouse gas emissions. RCP2.6 assumes stringent emissions reductions, while RCP8.5 is a high-emissions scenario in which current emissions continue.
Impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organization’s businesses, strategy, and financial planning
- Business impact assessment
We assess the potential impacts of climate change on our business and financial performance through scenario analysis based on the TCFD framework. In our TCFD-related activities in FY2020 and FY2021, we recognized that, under a 4°C scenario, increases in raw material procurement costs could pose a relatively significant risk to our business, and that, under a 2°C scenario, the introduction of carbon taxes, in addition to raw material procurement costs, could also pose a relatively significant risk. On the other hand, we recognized that an accelerated shift toward electric vehicles (EVs), driven by responses to climate change, could create significant business opportunities, particularly in the energy materials field. Based on these findings, in FY2024 we reassessed the potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on our business after revising the assumptions for EV and other vehicle sales, which are critical to formulating the profit plan for Phase 3 of our Medium-Term Business Plan.
- Climate-related risk priority assessment (identification of risks and opportunities)
In FY2024, in addition to our previous TCFD-related activities, we reassessed and identified climate-related risks and opportunities at our business sites, primarily our plants, and estimated their potential impact on our profits. The results are used as reference information for assessing the significance of climate-related risks and opportunities and are summarized in the table below.
| Category | Issue | Identified risks and opportunities | Overview | Business Segment | Time Horizon *1 |
Impact *2 |
Response Measures and Opportunity Capture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transition risks (1.5°C) |
Policy/ Regulation | Carbon tax | Taxation of emissions upon carbon tax introduction (consolidated, both within and outside Japan)*3 | All | Medium to long term | Significant | Energy conservation, process innovation, and energy conversion |
| LCA and CFP survey costs | Increased LCA and CFP survey costs due to tightened regulation | All | Short to long term | Small | Examination of effective cost reduction measures | ||
| Changes in customer behavior | ICE reduction and zero-emission vehicle adoption rate adoption rate | Decreased sales of products for combustion-engine vehicles as zero-emission vehicles become widespread *3 | Elastomers | Short to long term | Significant | Development of applications tailored to the adoption of EVs, and business portfolio restructuring | |
| Physical risks (4°C) |
Acute | Flood damage (damage to facilities) | Estimate of damage to facilities due to natural disasters *4 | All | Short to long term | Significant | Disaster preparedness measures, and strengthening of resilience |
| Flood damage (opportunity loss) | Opportunity loss due to natural disasters (assuming a one-month stoppage) | All | Short to long term | Moderate | Disaster preparedness measures, and strengthening of resilience | ||
| Chronic | Drought response costs | Increased costs due to water transfer from other areas *5 | All | Short to long term | Moderate | Discussion of drought response strategies and water recycling measures with regional councils | |
| Opportunities (1.5°C) |
Policy/ Regulation | Carbon pricing and carbon tax | Increased sales opportunities for products that contribute to CO2 reduction | All | Medium to long term | Significant | Production and utilization of bio-derived raw materials, and product recycling |
| Individual countries’ carbon emissions targets/policies | Higher demand for storage batteries for renewable energy | Energy Materials | Medium to long term | Significant | Expanding sales of Energy Materials due to growing demand for storage batteries | ||
| Industry/ Market/ Technology | Key products / Increase or decrease in product prices | Falling raw material prices *3 | All | Medium to long term | Significant | Formulation of strategies in response to fluctuating crude oil prices | |
| Changes in energy demand | Higher demand for Optical film due to widespread use of energy-saving TVs | Specialty Components | Short to long term | Moderate | Development of new film products in response to growing demand for energy saving TVs | ||
| Increased opportunities for Thermal Interface Material sales due to higher demand for power semiconductors | Specialty Materials | Medium to long term | Moderate | Development of Thermal Interface Material in response to growing demand for power semiconductors | |||
| Widespread use of low carbon technology | Increased demand for EV batteries *3 | Energy Materials | Short to long term | Significant | Expanding sales of Energy Materials due to growing demand for batteries | ||
| Evolution of next generation technologies | Business opportunities associated with the development of material recycling technology | Specialty Plastics | Medium to long term | Moderate | Establishment of recycling technology | ||
| Reputation | Changes in customer behavior | Customers prefer products with high recyclability | Specialty Materials | Short to long term | Significant | Creating premium value through recycled resin | |
| Opportunities (4°C) |
Acute | Disruption caused to operations by severe natural disasters | Increased sales opportunities resulting from large-scale natural disasters | Energy Materials/ |
Short to long term | Significant | Expanding sales of repair tape, and expanding sales of Energy Materials due to increased production of storage batteries |
| Chronic | Rising average temperatures | Increased sales accompanying rising temperatures | Specialty Materials | Medium to long term | Significant | Expanding sales of substitute products accompanying a decline in production of naturally-derived products | |
| Water stress | Decrease in natural rubber production due to droughts, etc. | Elastomers | Medium to long term | Moderate | Expanding sales of substitute products accompanying a decline in production of natural rubber |
- *1Time horizon Short term: Less than 3 years; Medium term: At least 3 years but less than 10 years; Long term: 10 years to 30 years or more
- *2Impact Significant: Estimated impact on profits equal to or more than 5 billion yen; Moderate: Estimated impact on profits ranging from 1–5 billion yen; Small: Estimated impact on profits less than 1 billion yen.
- *3For the 4°C scenario, estimation was based on the IEA’s STEPS scenario; for the 1.5°C scenario, estimation was based on the EV sales, crude oil prices, and carbon tax levels used in the IEA’s NZE scenario.
- *4The anticipated amount of damage was estimated as follows: Using the Multi-Layer Hazard Maps published by Japan’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), we determined the depth of flooding at Zeon Corporation’s six plants in Japan under the most severe anticipated rainfall (once in 1,000 years). We then estimated the damage rate using MLIT’s Manual for Economic Evaluation of Flood Control Investment and calculated the anticipated amount of damage based on that scenario.
- *5Estimated the cost of transporting water from another area during droughts at the Takaoka, Kawasaki, Tokuyama and Mizushima Plants, all of which use large quantities of water.
Resilience of the organization’s strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario
We assess the impacts of climate change on our business and strategy through multiple climate change scenarios, including scenarios of 2°C or lower, while evaluating the resilience of our strategy. In March 2024, Zeon received SBT certification for its science-based greenhouse gas emissions reduction target aligned with the 1.5°C pathway. As a basis for setting this target, in FY2023, we implemented a 1.5°C scenario analysis under a company-wide system, and identified climate-related risks and opportunities under this scenario and established the direction of our response measures. Through these initiatives, we aim to enhance the sustainability and resilience of our business and strategy by taking into account future changes under climate change scenarios, including scenarios of 2°C or lower. In addition, in our assessment based on climate change scenarios, including the 1.5°C scenario, we consider not only our business strategy but also the physical impacts on our plants, supply chain, and overseas Group companies. In recent years, we have assessed these physical impacts across our sites and supply chain and evaluated the sustainability and resilience of our business and strategy in light of future climate change impacts.
Risk management
Processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks
Based on the TCFD framework, we use 4°C and 1.5°C climate change scenarios to identify transition and physical risks associated with climate change out to 2030 and beyond. Identified risks are evaluated and classified according to their potential impacts and significance, and we conduct regular reviews of these assessments to continuously monitor climate-related risks and reassess their priorities. In FY2024, we added two more plants to the four previously analyzed, where we identified and distinguished transition and physical risks and conducted impact assessments.
Processes for managing climate-related risks
Climate-related risks are identified and evaluated based on the TCFD framework. Based on the results of these assessments, significant risks are discussed by the Sustainability Committee and deliberated and decided by the Management Committee, which is chaired by the Representative Director. The departments responsible for the relevant risks then proceed with measures to reduce and manage those risks, taking into account the likelihood of occurrence and the extent of their potential impact on the business. Through these processes, we continuously monitor climate-related risks and maintain a system for appropriately managing their impact on our business operations.
How processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organization’s overall risk management
We have established a system whereby the Risk Management Committee identifies and assesses company-wide risks, including climate-related risks, and reports the results to the Management Committee, which is chaired by the representative director. These risks are reported to the Board of Directors and are managed under the oversight of management. In FY2024, the TCFD Subcommittee incorporated climate-related risks identified through its assessments, such as heatstroke due to extreme heat and water shortages, into the company-wide risk management framework and evaluated them in an integrated manner together with other enterprise risks. In FY2025, we also conducted assessments of physical climate-related risks covering our business sites, Zeon Group companies outside Japan, and our supply chain. As described below, these assessments were carried out through a phased process combining screening and detailed assessments for each scope.
- Domestic Operations
Scope: All domestic business sites
Screening: Risk assessments were conducted using MLIT’s Multi-Layer Hazard Maps, based on planned-scale rainfall and maximum assumed flood scenarios.
Detailed assessment: Interviews were conducted at the sites identified as having relatively high risk, covering facility layouts, drainage measures, and business continuity plan (BCP) preparedness.
Assessment results: Although certain risk factors were identified at some sites, we confirmed that measures were already in place to provide a certain level of risk mitigation.
Future actions: As the current assessment is based primarily on interviews, we will consider introducing quantitative assessment methods, including external tools, to improve the accuracy of the assessment.
- Zeon Group companies outside Japan
Scope: All Zeon Group companies outside Japan
Screening: Risk priorities were established on the basis of self-assessments conducted by each company; water risk assessments using external tools such as Aqueduct, a water risk assessment tool provided by the World Resources Institute (WRI); past records of natural disasters; and other factors.
Detailed assessment: Interviews were conducted at the sites identified as having relatively high risk.
Interview topics: Flood and inundation preparedness, business continuity plans (BCPs), and alternative production and supply arrangements.
Assessment results: We confirmed that a certain level of risk mitigation measures had been implemented at the sites assessed, and concluded that the risks currently expected to have a significant impact on business operations are limited.
- Supply Chain
Scope: Major suppliers of principal and specialty raw materials, selected on the basis of transaction value
Screening: Physical risks at each supplier site were assessed using the Multi-Layer Hazard Maps for domestic suppliers, and Aqueduct for suppliers outside Japan.
Detailed assessment: Interviews were conducted with the suppliers identified as having relatively high risk.
Interview topics: Facility protection measures, business continuity measures in the event of flooding, and the availability of alternative supply sources.
Assessment results: Although certain risks were identified at some suppliers, we confirmed that existing measures limit the potential impact on supply.
The results of these assessments are reviewed and evaluated within our company-wide risk management framework and are managed in an integrated manner together with other management risks. We treat climate-related risks as part of our business operations and monitor and review them on a continuous basis.
Metrics and targets
GHG emissions
Zeon formulated its first Carbon Neutrality Master Plan in April 2022. In this plan, we have set the target to reduce Zeon Corporation’s Scope 1 and 2 CO2 emissions 50% from FY2019 levels by FY2030. We have adopted three approaches to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions: 1) Energy conservation; 2) Process innovation; and 3) Energy conversion.
In addition, in FY2023 we established the following Scope 1 + 2 and Scope 3 reduction targets for Zeon Group as a whole.
| Item | Base year | Target year | Reduction target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1, 2 | 2020 | 2030 | 42% reduction (1.5°C level) |
| Scope 3 | 25% reduction (WB 2.0°C level) |
In March 2024, we obtained SBT certification and consolidated the Group-wide targets into the reduction targets shown in the table above, which were set in FY2023. The method used to calculate GHG emissions complies with the GHG Protocol.

- *GHG emissions are calculated in accordance with the organizational boundaries and Scope classifications defined in the GHG Protocol.
- *Scope 1: Emission factors set under the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Accounting, Reporting and Disclosure System (SHK system)
- *Scope 2: Emissions are calculated in accordance with the GHG Protocol using the market-based method, reflecting environmental value from renewable energy options, non-fossil fuel certificates, and green heat certificates, etc.
- *Scope 3: emissions are calculated using the Ministry of the Environment’s Emission Factor Database for Calculating Greenhouse Gas Emissions throughout the Supply Chain.
Compensation system
In FY2023, Zeon introduced a performance-linked stock compensation system for directors and corporate officers. The indicators used to calculate this compensation include both financial and non-financial indicators (including ESG-related indicators) that are linked to the target values for the final year of each phase of the Medium-Term Business Plan.
Key Initiatives
CO2 emission reduction initiatives
Energy shift in plants in Japan
At four of our production sites in Japan (Takaoka Plant, Himi Futagami Plant, Tsuruga Plant, and Tokuyama Plant), we have converted purchased electricity to electricity effectively derived from renewable energy*.
Furthermore, at the Takaoka Plant, we have concluded a purchase agreement for carbon-neutral LNG with effectively zero CO2 emissions.
At the Tokuyama and Kawasaki Plants, we have entered into purchase agreements for green heat certificates to reduce CO2 emissions from steam.
In addition, at the Kawasaki Plant, we have adopted Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd.’s carbon-offset city gas and have also joined the Carbon Offset City Gas Buyers Alliance.
- *100% renewable electricity, or electricity backed by non-fossil fuel certificates (including renewable energy-derived and non-fossil power sources).

Development of Manufacturing Technology for Key Chemicals Used in Synthetic Rubber Based on Carbon Resource Circulation
We are developing technologies to efficiently produce butadiene and isoprene, which are key chemical materials for synthetic rubber, from renewable carbon resources such as used tires and biomass as feedstocks. This initiative contributes to carbon neutrality by reducing our dependence on fossil resources and advancing resource circulation, with social implementation targeted for the 2030s. In February 2025, we decided to introduce bench-scale equipment for a technology that efficiently produces butadiene from ethanol, including plant-derived ethanol. We are currently advancing technological verification and scale-up toward social implementation. This initiative has been selected for the Green Innovation Fund Project of the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).
Initiatives to Reduce CO2 Emissions in Logistics
We, as a designated shipper under the revised Energy Conservation Act, position the reduction of CO2 emissions in the logistics sector as an important environmental issue. In cooperation with logistics partners involved in the transportation of products and raw materials, we are working to optimize energy use. Specifically, we are promoting the optimization of the entire transportation process, including improving load efficiency, reviewing transportation routes and frequencies, and shifting to rail and maritime transport. We began these initiatives in earnest in FY2022 and have reduced CO2 emissions across our domestic transportation by 13% (Zeon estimate). Going forward, we will continue our efforts to achieve both environmental impact reduction and improved logistics efficiency and stability, with the aim of building a more sustainable logistics system.
Inter-Site Transportation of High-Performance Resin Pellets
We position the reduction of CO2 emissions associated with logistics as an important environmental issue, and in collaboration with SANKYU INC. and Fushiki Kairiku Unso Co.,Ltd., we undertook a fundamental review of the transportation scheme for high-performance resin pellets from the Mizushima Plant (Kurashiki City, Okayama Prefecture) to the Himi Futagami Plant (Himi City, Toyama Prefecture).
Previously, long-distance land transportation was conducted using tank lorries. Under this initiative, we changed the packaging format to 20-foot containers and introduced a modal shift to rail-based trunk transportation. As a result, transportation efficiency was improved, and CO2 emissions in trunk transportation were reduced by approximately 62% on a modified ton-kilometer basis. In addition, loading efficiency improved by approximately 40%, and driver working hours were reduced by approximately 68% due to fewer long-distance drives, achieving both environmental impact reduction and improved working conditions.
To enhance BCP resilience, container stock points (SPs) were established near the Mizushima Plant and in Himi (Fushiki Port), enabling more leveled operations and the establishment of a stable and efficient logistics system. To address the risk of mis-shipment associated with container-based transport, we introduced digital management using QR codes and OCR technology, strengthening traceability and preventing shipping errors.
This initiative received the “Encouragement Award” at the 1st Japan Logistics Awards organized by the Japan Federation of Freight Industries. It represents a sustainable logistics model that reduces CO2 emissions through collaboration with partner companies.

Adoption of internal carbon pricing (ICP) program
- 1Internal carbon price: 10,000 yen/t-CO2
- 2Scope of application: Capital investment that will lead to an increase or decrease in CO2 emissions
- 3Method of application: The increase or decrease in CO2 emissions accompanying the capital investment project in question will be converted into a monetary amount using the internal carbon price, and this will be taken into account when making the decision as to whether or not to invest in the project.
Calculation of GHG Emissions Reduction Contributions and Actual GHG Emissions Reductions
Zeon Corporation treats two things as important sustainability issues: steadily reducing the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated by its own business activities, and contributing to GHG emissions reductions across society through the chemical products and solutions it supplies.
To realize a decarbonized society, we believe it is important not only for companies to reduce their own emissions, but also to visualize, appropriately assess, and communicate the emissions reduction effects on society created when products and services transform the emissions profile of customers and society as a whole. Based on this concept, Zeon regards the creation of environmental value through its products and services as one of its key management priorities and is advancing related initiatives.
Against this backdrop, Zeon Corporation has begun initiatives to calculate and disclose GHG emissions reduction contributions—the amount of emissions avoided or reduced across society through its products and services—and actual GHG emissions reductions, which represent reductions achieved through its own business activities. These indicators are clearly distinguished from conventional GHG inventory–based emissions management.
Through these initiatives, we aim to demonstrate in an integrated manner our efforts toward decarbonization, the creation of business value, and our contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions across society, while promoting constructive dialogue with stakeholders.
Products Covered by the Calculation
As a first step, Zeon has calculated the GHG emissions reduction contributions of the following two products, certified under the Zeon SDGs Contribution Products Certification Program. These products have the potential to reduce GHG emissions more than conventional technologies by improving customers' manufacturing processes and product performance.
| Product | Overview |
|---|---|
| Specialty Solvent Cyclopentanone | Cyclopentanone is a specialty solvent used for developing and cleaning applications in semiconductor manufacturing. Its high recyclability allows it to be recovered and reused efficiently, which helps reduce resource consumption and waste generation and lowers GHG emissions across the life cycle. |
| ZeonorFilm® e-ZB Series Optical Film | ZeonorFilm® e-ZB Series is a high-performance optical film used in polarizers for LCD televisions. It enables high-transmittance polarizers, reducing backlight power consumption while maintaining image quality, thereby improving energy efficiency during television use. It also reduces material consumption and waste generation during manufacturing, lowering GHG emissions across the product life cycle. |
Definition of Indicators
To give a clear picture of our efforts toward a decarbonized society, we manage and disclose the following two indicators separately, with the aim of clearly demonstrating both our contribution to society through our products and services and our own decarbonization efforts.
GHG Emissions Reduction Contributions
This indicator represents the amount of GHG emissions avoided or reduced across society through the adoption of our products and services, measured against conditions prior to their adoption or against conventional products. It is distinct from the GHG emissions generated through our own business activities (GHG inventory) and reflects the contribution our products and services make to reducing GHG emissions across society.

Actual GHG Emissions Reductions
This indicator represents the GHG emissions actually reduced through our own business activities as a result of decarbonization investments, such as the introduction of energy-efficient equipment, feedstock conversion, and improvements to production processes. We use it primarily to quantitatively measure and manage the results of emissions reduction initiatives across the value chain, from raw material procurement to product shipment from our production sites.
Calculation Method
We set certain assumptions, such as the following, for each product and application. In calculating GHG emissions reduction contributions, we use external databases, including the Inventory Database for Environmental Analysis (IDEA), a life cycle assessment (LCA) database developed by the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST).
- Baseline (Conventional Technology/Product)
- Contribution Rate of Zeon's Products and Services to GHG Emissions Reductions
Uncertainty
The calculation relies on certain assumptions and estimates to account for variations in product use conditions, customer applications, and the availability of relevant data. Therefore, the resulting values are subject to a degree of uncertainty and should not be interpreted as precise measurements of actual GHG emissions reductions. The figures we disclose are reference values calculated as reasonable under specific conditions, and are not intended for direct comparison with figures disclosed by other companies. We will continue striving to improve our calculation methods and data accuracy, aiming for more reliable disclosure.
Calculation Results
The calculation results for the selected products are shown below.
| Unit (t-CO₂e) | FY2020 | FY2024 |
|---|---|---|
| GHG Emissions Reduction Contributions | 862,830 | 6,981,666 |
| Actual GHG Emissions Reductions | 3,098 | 865,929 |

- *As shown in the figure, Zeon’s GHG emissions reduction contributions increased significantly in FY2024 compared with FY2020. This increase was primarily attributable to the contribution of the high-performance ZeonorFilm® e-ZB Series optical film. The GHG emissions reduction contributions of the e-ZB Series were calculated based on the environmental standards for televisions in China (China National Standard GB 24850-2020), assuming that adoption of the e-ZB Series is required to comply with the standard. In addition, the recent expansion of production and supply of the e-ZB Series also contributed to the increase in GHG emissions reduction contributions.
Review by External Experts
To enhance the validity and transparency of its GHG emissions reduction contribution calculations, Zeon Corporation convened a GHG Emissions Reduction Contribution Review Panel comprising external experts. The panel reviewed the carbon footprint (CFP) calculations conducted in accordance with ISO 14067:2018, as well as the methodology used to calculate GHG emissions reduction contributions based on the Guidelines for Assessing Contribution to GHG Emission Reduction published by the Institute of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan. The panel confirmed the appropriateness of the underlying concepts and assumptions used in the calculations. The personnel responsible for each product presented the calculation methodologies and received expert advice on matters including baseline setting, calculation logic, and data handling. Zeon has incorporated these comments into its GHG emissions reduction contribution calculations.
Going forward, we will continue to leverage these expert insights to further improve our calculation methodologies and internal processes.
| Chair | Atsushi Inaba | Chairman, Japan Life Cycle Assessment Facilitation Centre |
|---|---|---|
| Member | Masaharu Motoshita | Nature Positive Technology Implementation Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) |
| Member | Junko Saeki | Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry (JEMAI) |

Future Direction
Zeon regards not only the steady reduction of GHG emissions from its own operations, but also contributing to GHG emissions reductions by customers and society through its products and services, as one of its key sustainability strategies.
Going forward, we will continue to refine our methodologies for calculating GHG emissions reduction contributions and improve the quality of the underlying data. At the same time, we will work to enhance the validity and transparency of our calculation processes by incorporating the expertise of external specialists.
We will also continue to provide stakeholders with clear, reliable information on our approach to GHG emissions reduction contributions and the results of our calculations, thereby further strengthening our contribution to the decarbonization of society.
Participation in the GX Future Consortium

We have joined the GX Future Consortium (GXFC), which was launched in April 2026.
The GXFC is a public–private collaboration platform that integrates initiatives to promote demand creation, smooth financing, and rulemaking related to GX (Green Transformation).
Through the GXFC, we participate in activities aimed at improving GX literacy and advancing the social implementation of GX, with the goal of contributing to a virtuous cycle between decarbonization and economic growth.
